Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Ceratosuchops inferodios
Taxonomy
Ceratosuchops inferodios was named by Barker et al. (2021). Its type specimen is IWCMS 2014.95.5, IWCMS 2021.30, IWCMS 2014.95.1-3, a partial skull, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Chilton Chine foreshore, near Brighstone, which is in a Barremian fluvial sandstone in the Wessex Formation of the United Kingdom. It is the type species of Ceratosuchops.
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
2021 | Ceratosuchops inferodios Barker et al. p. 4 |
2023 | Ceratosuchops inferodios Barker et al. p. 2 |
2023 | Ceratosuchops inferodios Santos-Cubedo et al. p. 1 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Ceratosuchops inferodios Barker et al. 2021
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
C. T. Barker et al. 2021 | Baryonychine distinguished by the presence of the following unique traits: premaxillae displaying a pair of bilaterally located antenarial tuberosities; narrow (reversal of the ancestral megalosauroid condition) and ventrally restricted subcondylar recess of the basioccipital; oval scars of the basisphenoid excavated by deep, elongate sulci; anteroposteriorly thick interbasipterygoidal web; supraoccipital dorsal process possessing a gently curving posteroventral surface in coronal section.
This taxon can be further separated from other baryonychines by the following combination of traits: presence of narial fossae on the premaxilla (as in cf. Suchomimus but not Baryonyx); short subnarial (maxillary) process of the premaxilla (as in Baryonyx but not cf. Suchomimus); lack of premaxillary sagittal crest (as in Baryonyx but not cf. Suchomimus); curved anterior margin of the dorsal facet of the paroccipital process (angular in Baryonyx and probably Riparovenator); posterolaterally directed paroccipital processes of the otoccipitals (more laterally directed in Baryonyx); exoccipital components of the occipital condyle closely spaced (as in Riparovenator and cf. Suchomimus but not Baryonyx); subcondylar recess lacking mediolaterally thick lateral crests (as in cf. Sucho- mimus but not Baryonyx or Riparovenator); relatively stout supraoccipital dorsal process (as in Baryonyx but not cf. Suchomimus); lack of a dorsal extension of the basisphenoid recess under the basioccipital apron (recess extends dorsally in Baryonyx and Riparovenator). |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: o = order | |||||
Reference: Marsh 1875 |